I don't consider having an account closed without an explanation as 'nit picking'.
Quote:
sites do have that right to withold that information as per our signing the agreement when we sign up.
Although all sites have the rule in place that they can close an account for any reason they determine, I don't recall any of them saying that they also have the right to not tell that player the reason. In many cases, it could be a very simple misunderstanding, but without a reason being given and no access to the site to find out, how does a person defend himself and possibly straighten out the problem if the site shuts you out of the equation?
If a site can insist that you send personal documentation, including the CVN number of your credit card number, there is absolutely NO reason why a site can't email the player with the reason for the account being disabled. Embarrassment is no excuse....I would gladly explain an embarrassing situation in order to straighten out a problem if possible rather than be dumped by a site with no explanation at all. Every person who has come here with a problem and asked for help has taken embarrassment to a high level by giving BPU full access to represent them in order to sort out a problem....what makes a bingo site so reluctant to confront that issue one on one with the player and accomplish the same goal?
Every site I have ever quit playing at, I have sent a tt or an email telling them why I am unhappy about something....I fully expect that a site should have enough balls to talk to me, since they have the testostrogen in abundance when they shut me out in the first place. Being empowered shouldn't be a one-way street. My money helped keep them afloat, and it should at the very least deem the respect due me by telling me why they don't want me at their site anymore.
WBN had already closed my account by accusing me of multiple account reasons (I posted that information here); however, they were too little with that too late because they had three years or more to discover that problem since I had repeatedly over time asked them if I had multiple accounts due to mergers, etc. and help me work that out because I had already sent them an email first telling them I was quitting their site, so I took away their power. BPU is asking that we not speculate or rock the boat with WBN in order to get the other players paid as promised....that is utter blackmail garbage. WBN cannot hurt ME because I don't belong with them anymore, so if I say anything against them, they are going to do what????? Withhold payment to OTHER people because BPU can't control their membership?????? This is not speculation....Sissy pretty much said this exact same thing in her post.
Quote:
IMPORTANT!!! Aside from the players who have already come to BPU for help with their issues concerning WBN, we will no longer be taking any new complaints. Should anyone have a complaint, they should take them directly to WBN to handle.
Quote:
There are things we cannot disclose at this time. If you have any trust at all in BPU, let us get these people their winnings.
Quote:
BPU staff would like to request that all of our members not assume anything in this case. We simply are not at liberty to discuss the reasons as per our agreement to get these players their money. Can you find it within you to see any positive at all from this? I most certainly do. I see players getting paid their money... that is why they came here.
I don't know what the problem is with the admins of BPU anymore, but the restrictions regarding free speech in here has become as restrictive as chatrooms in online bingo sites anymore. You tell us to not make any assumptions but you feed us information in bits and drabs leaving us to do nothing BUT make assumptions or speculate because you have cut some kind of deal behind closed doors with sites and always with a promise that 'more is coming' but we aren't allowed to even ask questions anymore without stepping on somebody's toes.
As an example: You just posted that WBN is paying the players who have already complained about non payment in BPU, BUT you are no longer going to take any complaints against that site, evidently as part of a deal you have made with them (again, an assumption on my part because you gave NO explanation as to WHY you won't take any further complaints regarding nonpayment to players from WBN). So where does that leave any future players who don't get payment and has their accounts closed conveniently by WBN?
I posted a complaint that my account at IPlay by Maxi for posting publicly in BPU about them. I was immediately reprimanded for making an assumption because it wasn't actually Maxi who closed the account, but another bigwig at IPlay.
I posted speculation about an organization called Bingo Worldwide Limited....that is advertising publicly that they own at least three networks or sites that BPU has blacklisted, but also publicly is advertising that they also own BingoMania, which happens to be on the approved list here. I was again immediately reprimanded for breaking a rule here regarding saying anything adverse regarding an approved site without asking BPU about it privately first. Have you guys done ANYTHING about checking into that company? I don't think so because you seem to be too busy cutting deals with WBN now that they have announced that they aren't going to allow gifting anymore. Big freaking deal if they are still closing accounts of people they owe money to and convinced BPU that you should take no further complaints about that huge issue.
As to your comment about 'third party' intervention in order to get people paid....BPU advertises in their own banner about how you have managed to get thousands of dollars paid to people who have been ripped off by online bingo sites. If that's not third party intervention, what is? The whole purpose of BPU's existence has previously been to get sites to deal with their players fairly....which includes having a place to come to with complaints about sites, which I have repeatedly been reprimanded for by the admins here.
Comparing BPU with bingo site chatrooms where no one is allowed to verbalize a complaint without being warned or having chat disabled, it is beginning to seem that BPU only wants posts that are giving kudos to a site, even if the only thing that site has changed is that they are willing to 'talk' to BPU even if they change nothing else at their site or they give a token gesture, such as stopping gifting with the understanding that BPU will no longer take complaints from members about that site or pay a couple of people while ignoring others who will remain unpaid (there are a number of sites that have done that just to shut BPU up).
Like I said, I don't know what's going on with BPU anymore, but this site no longer is what you are representing yourselves to be. It seems, more and more, that you are advocates for bingo sites rather than advocates for players. You cite baby steps regarding changes....I personally feel that you have spun into a totally different direction and have settled for tokens rather than advocating any real changes. You had more integrity previously, in my opinion, when you didn't take any crap from any site and made more strides with changes. You most certainly would not have agreed to not take complaints about a site in order to get the ones who DID complain and needed your help to get paid.
You have disappointed me. If you don't want people making assumptions, then you have little choice but to actually give people information and not inuendo or to stop dangling tidbits such as 'we'll tell you at some future date'. It's kind of like reading a series of Harry Potter books.....some day maybe we'll get the whole story, when BPU decides to tell it or because some site has finally given you permission to inform your membership. Heaven forbid, BPU should protect its membership from depositing at a site while you work out your behind the scenes deals.
I'm heading to the bathroom to throw up now..........